Sorenson v. Gardner
Oregon Supreme Court
334 P.2d 471 (1959)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The seller of a house (defendant) told the prospective buyer (plaintiff) that the house met all minimum code requirements according to state law. In fact, this was not the case as the house did not meet all necessary state law codes. The plaintiff did not know the facts behind the house not being in compliance with code. The plaintiff brought suit for misrepresentation of law. The trial court found in favor the plaintiff and the defendant appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lusk, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.