South Central Petroleum, Inc. v. Long Brothers Oil Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
974 F.2d 1015 (1992)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Long Brothers Oil Company (Long Brothers) (plaintiff) brought suit against South Central Petroleum, Inc. (SCPI) (defendant) to determine the proper ownership of an oil well. At trial, SCPI called an expert witness who gave an opinion about the proper revenue calculation for determining the amount that was due to Long Brothers for SCPI’s share of the well. The expert witness based his testimony on information that he had received from a commercial production service. The commercial production service had, in turn, received the information from the state government, which had received the information from the operator of the well. There was no dispute that the information forming the basis of the expert’s opinion was hearsay. There was also no dispute that the information was of a type relied upon by experts in the particular field. The district court admitted the expert witness’s opinion testimony, but only the opinion itself and not the underlying information. SCPI moved for summary judgment. The district court granted the motion based on the expert’s revenue calculation. Long Brothers appealed, arguing that the district court abused its discretion by relying on inadmissible hearsay evidence.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Heaney, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.