Speckel v. Perkins
Minnesota Court of Appeals
364 N.W.2d 890 (1985)
Facts
Sandra Speckel (plaintiff) sued Laurri Perkins (defendant) for damages resulting from a car accident. Speckel’s attorney, Stephen Eckman, requested the insurance policy limit of $50,000 to settle the case. A week before the scheduled trial, Perkins’s attorney, Donald Wheat, wrote a letter to Eckman, stating that he could not agree that this is a “limits case.” The letter offered to settle the case for $50,000. Wheat’s letter also offered to relay any offer Eckman may wish to make back to Perkins’s insurance company for its consideration. Eckman accepted the offer to settle for $50,000. Wheat informed Eckman that his letter was intended to offer a settlement for $15,000, not $50,000. The trial court granted Speckel’s motion to compel performance of the settlement agreement for $50,000. Perkins appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lansing, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 707,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
