Splendorio v. Bilray Demolition Co., Inc.
Rhode Island Supreme Court
682 A.2d 461 (1996)
- Written by Meagan Anglin, JD
Facts
Certified Engineering and Testing Co., Inc., (Certified) (defendant) contracted with Providence Housing Authority (PHA) to inspect for the existence of asbestos in public-housing buildings scheduled to be demolished. If Certified found asbestos, Certified was required to develop a plan for abatement of the asbestos prior to the demolition of the building. Certified found asbestos in the buildings scheduled for demolition and developed a plan for D. Dixon Donovan Co. (Dixon) to remove the asbestos. After Dixon removed the asbestos, Certified reexamined the building and found no asbestos. PHA then hired Bilray Demolition Co. (Bilray) (defendant) to demolish the buildings. Bilray took the debris from the demolition site to a waste facility. It also took some of the debris to Bilray’s own wrecking yard, in violation of state law. A few years later, Certified was examining another building and discovered a thin coat of asbestos. Certified decided to analyze the debris of the public-housing buildings demolished earlier and found a small amount of asbestos. Frances and Anthony Splendorio (plaintiffs) lived in the vicinity of Bilray’s wrecking yard, and thus within the vicinity of a small amount of asbestos. The Splendorios brought suit against Certified, Bilray, and another defendant, alleging the value of their property decreased as a result of the presence of asbestos in the wrecking yard. Certified moved for summary judgment on the claims for absolute liability and negligence. The trial court granted the motion for summary judgment, finding that Certified was not subject to absolute liability and that Certified had no duty to the Splendorios, because the harm suffered was unforeseeable. The Splendorios appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bourcier, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.