Splendorio v. Bilray Demolition Co., Inc.

682 A.2d 461 (1996)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Splendorio v. Bilray Demolition Co., Inc.

Rhode Island Supreme Court
682 A.2d 461 (1996)

Facts

Certified Engineering and Testing Co., Inc., (Certified) (defendant) contracted with Providence Housing Authority (PHA) to inspect for the existence of asbestos in public-housing buildings scheduled to be demolished. If Certified found asbestos, Certified was required to develop a plan for abatement of the asbestos prior to the demolition of the building. Certified found asbestos in the buildings scheduled for demolition and developed a plan for D. Dixon Donovan Co. (Dixon) to remove the asbestos. After Dixon removed the asbestos, Certified reexamined the building and found no asbestos. PHA then hired Bilray Demolition Co. (Bilray) (defendant) to demolish the buildings. Bilray took the debris from the demolition site to a waste facility. It also took some of the debris to Bilray’s own wrecking yard, in violation of state law. A few years later, Certified was examining another building and discovered a thin coat of asbestos. Certified decided to analyze the debris of the public-housing buildings demolished earlier and found a small amount of asbestos. Frances and Anthony Splendorio (plaintiffs) lived in the vicinity of Bilray’s wrecking yard, and thus within the vicinity of a small amount of asbestos. The Splendorios brought suit against Certified, Bilray, and another defendant, alleging the value of their property decreased as a result of the presence of asbestos in the wrecking yard. Certified moved for summary judgment on the claims for absolute liability and negligence. The trial court granted the motion for summary judgment, finding that Certified was not subject to absolute liability and that Certified had no duty to the Splendorios, because the harm suffered was unforeseeable. The Splendorios appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bourcier, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership