Sporhase v. Nebraska ex rel. Douglas
United States Supreme Court
458 U.S. 941 (1982)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Joy Sporhase and others (defendants) owned contiguous tracts of land in Nebraska (plaintiff) and Colorado. A well on the Nebraska side pumped groundwater to irrigate both the Nebraska and the Colorado tracts. A Nebraska statute prohibited withdrawing groundwater and transporting it for use in an adjoining state without a permit. Generally the state would grant a permit if withdrawing the water was reasonable, consistent with the conservation and use of groundwater, and not detrimental to the public welfare. However, the statute specified that the state where the water went also had to grant reciprocal rights. Because Colorado prohibited withdrawing groundwater for use in another state, Sporhase could not have obtained a permit. Nebraska brought suit to enjoin Sporhase from transporting the water across the state line without a permit. Sporhase countered that the statute was unconstitutional on the ground that it imposed an unreasonable burden on interstate commerce. The trial court granted an injunction, and the Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed, reasoning that groundwater is not an article of commerce. Sporhase appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
Dissent (Rehnquist, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.