Spratt v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
482 F.3d 33 (2007)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
Wesley Spratt (plaintiff) was serving a life sentence for murder. During his incarceration, he underwent a religious awakening and became a devout Christian. Spratt began preaching to inmates at the weekly prison services. After eight years of preaching, a new prison warden informed Spratt that he was not allowed to preach to inmates because it violated the Rhode Island Department of Corrections’ (RIDOC) (defendant) policy that religious services be directed by institutional chaplains. Spratt filed suit under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) and alleged that the policy violated his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. An RIDOC official filed an affidavit, claiming that the policy was the least-restrictive means of promoting the compelling governmental interest in safety because placing an inmate in a position of perceived leadership gives that inmate influence over the prison population. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the RIDOC. Spratt appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Torruella, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.