Stadia Oil & Uranium Co. v. Wheelis

251 F.2d 269 (1957)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Stadia Oil & Uranium Co. v. Wheelis

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
251 F.2d 269 (1957)

Facts

Stadia Oil & Uranium Company (Stadia) (defendant) sold unregistered shares in Stadia to Wheelis and others (plaintiffs). Wheelis sued Ben Rankin (defendant) and Stadia claiming, among other things, that Rankin was liable for Stadia’s illegal sales of shares because he was a control person of Stadia within the meaning of § 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. At trial, Rankin denied knowing about or participating in the relevant sales. However, Wheelis presented evidence that Rankin was one of Stadia’s organizers, served as a Stadia vice president, and was one of Stadia’s three directors. Wheelis further presented evidence that Rankin presided over and participated in board meetings at which the relevant sales were discussed and authorized and that he signed two of the relevant stock certificates. After weighing the parties’ competing evidence, the jury found that Rankin was liable for the illegal sales because he was a control person of Stadia. Rankin appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Breitenstein, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership