Staley v. Stephens
Indiana Court of Appeals
404 N.E.2d 633 (1980)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Paul R. and Suzanne B. Staley (plaintiffs) sued Paul L. and Carolyn A. Stephens (defendants) in connection with their contract for the sale and purchase of property in a residential subdivision. A pre-closing survey disclosed that the Staley's house infringed on subdivision setback requirements by one and one-sixth feet, and infringed on the local zoning setback line by about two inches. Several years remained before the statute of limitations on challenging the infringements would expire. The Stephenses asked the Staleys to get their neighbors to waive their rights to litigate over the infringements, but the Staleys refused to do so. In response, the Stephenses pulled out of the contract, on the grounds that the Staleys could not fulfill their contractual obligation to convey marketable title to the property. The Staleys sued. The trial court entered summary judgment for the Stephenses, and the Staleys appealed to the Indiana Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Robertson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.