State ex rel. Romley v. Dairman, a Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona

95 P.3d 548 (2004)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State ex rel. Romley v. Dairman, a Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona

Arizona Court of Appeals
95 P.3d 548 (2004)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Martin Quihuis (defendant) was charged with molestation of a child and dangerous crimes against children. The victims were two cousins who lived with Quihuis and the children’s legal guardians. The state (plaintiff) moved for the appointment of representatives other than the children’s legal guardians to represent the interests of the children as victims of the charged offenses. The trial court denied the state's motion. The state filed a special action in the Arizona Court of Appeals. Quihuis argued that appointment of representatives for the children would violate the presumption of innocence to which he was entitled.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Barker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership