State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. North Carolina Waste Awareness and Reduction Network

805 S.E.2d 712 (2017)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. North Carolina Waste Awareness and Reduction Network

North Carolina Court of Appeals
805 S.E.2d 712 (2017)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

The North Carolina Waste Awareness and Reduction Network (NC WARN) (plaintiff) sought to provide affordable solar electricity to nonprofit organizations. In December 2014, NC WARN and a Greensboro church entered into a power-purchase agreement, which provided that NC WARN would install, own, and operate a solar-panel system on the church’s property. NC WARN was to produce the electricity, and the church was to compensate NC WARN for each kilowatt hour (kWh) consumed. The church was in the exclusive territory of Duke Energy Progress, LLC and Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (collectively, Duke Energy). It was common for states to limit natural competition within the electricity industry by granting exclusive service territories to utilities to avoid duplication of investments, economic waste, and inefficient service. In June 2015, NC WARN sought a declaratory ruling from the North Carolina Utilities Commission (commission) (defendant) that it would not be regarded as a public utility under the Public Utilities Act if it provided solar electricity to the church. The commission determined that NC WARN’s arrangement with the church called for classification as a public utility under N.C.G.S. § 62-30, which defined public utility as any entity that provides electricity “to or for the public for compensation.” The commission fined NC WARN for each day that it provided electricity service. NC WARN appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Murphy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership