State of Washington, Department of Ecology v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
752 F.2d 1465 (1985)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) empowered the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to administer a comprehensive federal program for the management of hazardous waste. RCRA also authorized state governments to implement their own hazardous-waste-management programs, provided that those programs were substantially equivalent to the EPA program. The State of Washington (the state) (plaintiff) sought EPA approval of the state’s own RCRA-equivalent program. The EPA administrator refused to approve the program to the extent that it would apply to Native Americans on Native American lands, reasoning that Congress did not intend to confer such authority on state governments. The state petitioned the United State Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for review of the EPA decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Canby, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 829,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.