State of Washington, Department of Ecology v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

752 F.2d 1465 (1985)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State of Washington, Department of Ecology v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
752 F.2d 1465 (1985)

Facts

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) empowered the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to administer a comprehensive federal program for the management of hazardous waste. RCRA also authorized state governments to implement their own hazardous-waste-management programs, provided that those programs were substantially equivalent to the EPA program. The State of Washington (the state) (plaintiff) sought EPA approval of the state’s own RCRA-equivalent program. The EPA administrator refused to approve the program to the extent that it would apply to Native Americans on Native American lands, reasoning that Congress did not intend to confer such authority on state governments. The state petitioned the United State Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for review of the EPA decision.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Canby, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 829,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 829,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 829,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership