State v. Batangan
Supreme Court of Hawaii
71 Haw. 552 (1990)
Felomino Batangan (defendant) was charged with sexual abuse of his daughter. The victim alleged that Batangan physically and sexually abused her when she was six or seven years old. The victim could not provide any specific dates nor were any of the acts specific to one incident or another. There were no witnesses to the alleged acts. The victim did not report the abuse until several months after they occurred when she reported physical abuse to school officials. She then recanted the allegations of physical abuse but accused Batangan of sexual abuse. The victim then recanted the allegations of sexual abuse, but testified to them at trial. Batangan was tried on charges of sexual abuse. At trial, the prosecution presented Dr. John Bond as an expert in the field of clinical psychology with a subspecialty in sexually abused children. Bond testified as to how he evaluates whether a child is telling the truth about sex abuse. Bond then implicitly testified that the victim here was believable and that he believed she had been abused by Batangan. Batangan was convicted of first degree sex abuse. He appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Wakatsuki, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.