State v. Beadle

265 P.3d 863 (2011)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Beadle

Washington Supreme Court
265 P.3d 863 (2011)

RW

Facts

The State of Washington (plaintiff) prosecuted Steven Beadle (defendant) for an incident involving the attempted rape of three-year-old BA. Following the incident, BA had several encounters with adults to whom she gave consistent and credible verbal and demonstrative accounts of what happened. These encounters included a formal interview with a police detective who was gathering evidence against Beadle and informal exchanges between BA and her parents and mental-health counselors. Beadle was not present during any of these encounters. When Beadle came to trial, BA refused to testify and panicked each time anyone pressed her to do so. BA rebuffed every effort the trial judge made to accommodate her, including the judge’s offer to let BA testify by closed-circuit television instead of from the witness stand. In light of these rebuffs, the judge ruled that the girl was unavailable to testify. Instead, the judge admitted the hearsay testimony of the adults to whom BA had described the incident. This testimony was overwhelmingly corroborated by other evidence. The jury found Beadle guilty of child molestation, and an intermediate appellate court affirmed his conviction. Beadle appealed to the Washington Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Madsen, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 814,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership