State v. Bean

582 So. 2d 947 (1991)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Bean

Louisiana Court of Appeal
582 So. 2d 947 (1991)

Facts

On April 17, 1989, John Wesley “Sugar Boy” Bean (defendant) went to the home of his estranged wife, Elgie Mack. Bean and Mack subsequently left the home in Bean’s father’s car. Bean and Mack’s four-year-old daughter, Cherdaria, and Cherdaria’s seven-year-old cousin, Barbara Peterson, were in the car’s backseat. During the car ride, Bean shot Mack, and Mack fell out of the car. Cherdaria and Peterson ran from the car after the shooting. Mack died, and the State of Louisiana (plaintiff) charged Bean with murder. At trial, the state presented testimony from a bystander who spoke to Cherdaria immediately after Cherdaria ran from the car. The witness testified that Cherdaria said, “Sugar Boy shot my mama,” and asked, “Why would my daddy kill my mama?” The state also called Peterson as a witness. Because of Peterson’s age, the trial court held a competency hearing to determine whether to allow Peterson to testify. Peterson seemed scared and shy, but she told the judge that she understood the difference between a truth and a lie. The judge found that Peterson was competent and allowed her to testify. Following the trial, the jury found Bean guilty. Bean appealed to the Louisiana Court of Appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Victory, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership