State v. Beasley

1995 WL 453082 (1995)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Beasley

Ohio Court of Appeals
1995 WL 453082 (1995)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Mack Germany was driving on a highway with a U-Haul trailer. Germany noticed the load had come loose, pulled into the emergency lane, and got out of the truck. Rodney Beasley (defendant), who was driving partially in the emergency lane, struck and killed Germany. Beasley was charged with aggravated vehicular homicide for recklessly causing Germany’s death while operating a motor vehicle. There was no evidence at trial that Beasley was speeding or driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Witnesses testified that Beasley was weaving before the accident and driving in the emergency lane. Beasley testified that he was checking his load to see if it had shifted and that he applied his brakes before hitting Germany. After striking Germany, Beasley returned to the accident scene. Beasley was convicted after trial. On appeal, Beasley argued that the trial court should have instructed the jury on the lesser included offense of vehicular homicide.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sundermann, J.)

Concurrence (Painter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership