Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

State v. Bowens

Supreme Court of New Jersey
532 A.2d 215 (1987)


Facts

Under New Jersey law, a homicide is murder when committed purposely or knowingly, and a homicide is aggravated manslaughter when committed under circumstances manifesting an extreme indifference to human life. The statutory definition of self-defense was amended to establish an objective standard under which the use of force is justifiable if the defendant reasonably believes that such force is immediately necessary to protect against the use of unlawful force. Anthony Rivers (defendant) argued with a man, who picked up a knife and threatened to stab Rivers. When the man moved away, Rivers reached for a knife. When the man approached again, Rivers stabbed and killed the man, fearing for his own life. At trial, the court refused to instruct the jury on imperfect self-defense and instructed the jury on reckless manslaughter instead. The jury convicted Rivers of aggravated manslaughter. In a separate case, Leon Bowens (defendant) had been threatened with a knife by John Booker on many occasions and knew that Booker was a violent man. One day, Booker approached Bowens, causing Bowens to fear an attack. Bowens showed Booker a knife, and Booker retreated but then approached again. Believing that Booker was going to stab him, Bowens stabbed Booker. At trial, the court refused to instruct the jury on imperfect self-defense and instructed the jury on murder and complete self-defense. The jury found Bowens guilty of first-degree murder. The appellate court reversed, finding that the trial court had erred in not charging the jury on the manslaughter offenses. The prosecution appealed. Rivers’s and Bowens’s cases were presented as companion appeals.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (O’Hern, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.