State v. Cargile

2008 WL 2350644 (2008)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 37,500+ case briefs...

State v. Cargile

Ohio Court of Appeals

2008 WL 2350644 (2008)

Facts

An individual was assaulted by a group of young men, and his cell phone was taken from his pocket. Cleveland Cargile (defendant) was identified as one of the assailants. Cargile was arrested, handcuffed, patted down, and transported to jail. Before entering the jail, a police officer warned Cargile that it would be a crime to convey drugs into the jail and Cargile should tell the officer if he had any contraband. Cargile denied having any contraband. When Cargile was being booked, the officers saw Cargile move his right leg and found three bags of marijuana concealed in Cargile’s pant-leg cuff. Cargile was charged with robbery and illegal conveyance of a controlled substance into a detention facility. After trial, a jury found him not guilty of robbery but guilty of the conveyance charge. On appeal, Cargile argued that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McMonagle, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 631,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 37,500 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership