State v. Dotson
Louisiana Supreme Court
234 So. 3d 34, 2017 WL 4681942 (2017)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Derrick Dotson (defendant) was indicted for aggravated rape. During voir dire, a prospective juror, K.C., indicated that her mother had been raped and murdered and that what happened to her mother might affect her ability to be a fair and impartial juror in Dotson’s case. K.C. was not asked any follow-up questions. Defense counsel challenged the juror for cause. The judge stated that the fact that K.C.’s mother had been raped and murdered was not cause. When defense counsel started to say that K.C. “said that would—,” the judge interrupted with, “No, she didn’t.” The court of appeal reversed Dotson’s conviction, holding that bias, prejudice, or the inability to decide the case based on the law could be reasonably implied from K.C.’s response, and therefore the trial court abused its discretion in denying Dotson’s challenge of K.C. for cause. The state (plaintiff) appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Weimer, J.)
Dissent (Guidry, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.