State v. Handy

732 So. 2d 134 (1999)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Handy

Louisiana Court of Appeal
732 So. 2d 134 (1999)

Facts

The State of Louisiana (plaintiff) alleged that Reginald Handy (defendant) raped his ex-girlfriend on November 9, 1997. A medical examination revealed that the victim had a vaginal abrasion/laceration, facial abrasions, and a bite mark on her neck. Swabs of the victim’s vaginal area did not reveal the presence of semen. Handy denied raping the victim. Prior to trial, Handy filed a motion seeking to present evidence of the victim’s prior sexual activity with Theo McGriff on the night of the alleged rape. McGriff admitted to having sex with the victim on that night, but he denied being rough with the victim and said that he did not hear the victim complain that he was being rough or hurting her. The trial court denied Handy’s motion, and Handy filed a pretrial writ with the Louisiana Court of Appeal seeking review of the trial court’s ruling.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Jones, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership