State v. Holmes
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
920 A.2d 632 (2007)
While walking through Rochester with a friend, the victim met Martin Homes (defendant). Holmes was 24 years old, and the victim was 15 years old. However, the victim informed Holmes that she was 17 years old. Holmes and the victim exchanged phone numbers. About a week after the initial meeting, the victim, under the influence of alcohol, phoned Holmes and arranged to meet in a park. Holmes and the victim met up and had sexual intercourse. Holmes was convicted of felonious sexual assault for sexual penetration of a person between the ages of 13 and 16. Homes appealed on the ground that the trial court erred by failing to require the prosecution to show that Holmes was aware that the victim was under the age of legal consent.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Dalianis, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 173,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.