State v. Hurst

828 So. 2d 1165 (2002)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Hurst

Louisiana Court of Appeal
828 So. 2d 1165 (2002)

Facts

Allen Delatte was shot outside the New Orleans Superdome after an event called the Super Fair. Police detectives identified Duvander Hurst (defendant) as the suspected shooter. A news reporter from WWL-TV went to the home of Ethel Hurst, Hurst’s mother, to ask her about the shooting. Ethel told the reporter that she was Hurst’s mother. Ethel also told the reporter that Hurst told her that he had been at the Super Fair but did not have anything to do with the shooting. Hurst eventually turned himself in to police, and the State of Louisiana (plaintiff) charged him with second-degree murder. At Hurst’s trial, the prosecution played a videotape of the WWL-TV report featuring Ethel and the reporter. Only Ethel’s hand was visible on the videotape, but Ethel testified at trial and admitted that she made the statements to the reporter. The jury found Hurst guilty of second-degree murder, and he appealed to the Louisiana Court of Appeal. On appeal, Hurst argued that the trial court improperly allowed the jury to view the videotape because it contained hearsay within hearsay—Ethel’s statements to the reporter and Hurst’s statement to Ethel that Hurst had been at the Super Fair.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kirby, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership