State v. King

468 S.E.2d 232 (1996)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. King

North Carolina Supreme Court
468 S.E.2d 232 (1996)

SC

Facts

Ernest King (defendant) was charged with the murder of Meredith Mark Peaks. At trial, the prosecution (plaintiff) called Eric Shaw as a witness. Shaw testified over King’s objection that he sold cocaine for King and that King ran a drug organization. Shaw testified that a few days before Peaks was killed, Peaks robbed one of King’s drug dealers. When the dealer told King about it, Shaw heard King say, “nobody was going to take nothing” from him. Shaw also testified that he subsequently heard King say that King was going to make Peaks a ghost. Finally, Shaw testified that he saw King kill Peaks. King was convicted, and he appealed, arguing that the detailed testimony about his drug dealing should not have been admitted.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lake, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership