State v. McAdams

193 So. 3d 824 (2016)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. McAdams

Florida Supreme Court
193 So. 3d 824 (2016)

DC

Facts

In October 2009, police asked McAdams (defendant) to come to the station to speak with detectives during an investigation into the disappearance of McAdams’s estranged wife and her boyfriend. The officers specifically told McAdams that he was not under arrest and did not issue Miranda warnings before starting an interview at the station. Unbeknownst to McAdams, an attorney retained by McAdams’s father came to the police station during the interview but was not allowed to go to the interview room. Officers told the attorney that messages could not be sent to McAdams by any means and, before leaving the station, the attorney told officers that he wanted the interview to stop. McAdams was never told about the attorney, and detectives continued the interview. Ten minutes after the attorney left the station, McAdams confessed to killing his estranged wife and her boyfriend. At trial for the murders, McAdams filed a motion to suppress the confession and related evidence, arguing that he was denied his right to counsel. The state (plaintiff) and McAdams petitioned the court for review of a certified question of whether police must inform an individual being questioned in a nonpublic area about the presence of a retained attorney.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lewis, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership