State v. McAlpin

740 P.2d 824 (1987)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. McAlpin

Washington Supreme Court
740 P.2d 824 (1987)

Facts

Douglas McAlpin (defendant) entered a plea agreement with the state (plaintiff) and pleaded guilty to first-degree robbery. McAlpin also confessed to involvement in additional burglaries and criminal trespasses but was not charged with these crimes because McAlpin agreed to make restitution. A presentence investigation report showed that McAlpin had an extensive juvenile record, including five felony convictions before McAlpin turned 15 years old, two second-degree theft convictions when McAlpin was between 15 and 18 years old, and several additional felony arrests that prosecutors handled informally. The presumptive sentencing range for first-degree robbery was 46 to 61 months. The sentencing statute permitted the court to consider the seriousness of the crime and the offender’s criminal history when sentencing the defendant. The sentencing statute limited consideration of criminal history to current convictions and prior juvenile convictions for offenses committed when the defendant was between 15 and 18 years old. The state recommended the maximum of 61 months. The trial court sentenced McAlpin to 90 months. McAlpin appealed the sentence.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Callow, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership