Supreme Court of Oregon
8 P.3d 212 (2000)
Michael McNeely (defendant) was charged with aggravated murder. At trial, the state sought to introduce testimony from Thompson, a jail inmate who testified to statements that McNeely allegedly made to him while they were both incarcerated. Specifically, Thompson testified that McNeely said he choked and killed the victim. McNeely moved to exclude the testimony based on the fact that Thompson could not identify McNeely in court as the inmate Thompson had spoken to in jail. Evidence presented at trial showed that McNeely and Thompson had met in jail several years prior and that McNeely had since gained 25 pounds and shaved off his moustache. The trial court held that a reasonable jury could find that McNeely was the person Thompson had spoken to in jail, even if Thompson could not identify McNeely in court. McNeely was convicted of aggravated murder. McNeely appealed the admission of Thompson’s testimony.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Van Hoomissen, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.