Supreme Court of Washington
381 P.2d 617 (Wash. 1963)
Oswalt (defendant) was charged with robbery and burglary due to an incident in Seattle. At trial he asserted a defense of alibi. In presenting that defense, he called the owner of a restaurant in Portland who testified that Oswalt had been in the restaurant in Portland every day for the previous couple of months, including the day the burglary occurred. To rebut this evidence, the prosecution introduced the testimony of a police detective who stated that he saw and talked to Oswalt in Seattle about one month prior to the burglary. He also testified that Oswalt told him that he had been in Seattle for a couple of days. Oswalt objected to this testimony, but the trial court admitted it and convicted him. Oswalt appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hamilton, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.