State v. Peters
Wisconsin Supreme Court
665 N.W.2d 171 (2003)
Pamela Peters (defendant) was arrested after shoplifting a videogame system. Peters gave a false name to the police and identified herself as Patricia Panzer, who was the ex-wife of Peters’s husband. The State of Wisconsin (plaintiff) charged her, and Peters sought bail using the false name. The request for bail was supported by a lack of criminal history and a stable address. Based on this evidence, bail was reduced from $20,000 to $10,000 cash with a $10,000 signature bond. The state quickly discovered the deception and sought to increase the bond. Peters did have a history of criminal convictions and other warrants outstanding. Bail was increased to $30,000. The sate amended the charges to include identity theft. Peters moved to dismiss the identity-theft charge, arguing that seeking bail under someone else’s identity was not an act prohibited by the statute. The trial court granted the motion, and the state appealed. The court of appeals certified the question to the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Sykes, J.)
Concurrence (Bablitch, J.)
Concurrence (Abrahamson, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.