State v. Preston

728 A.2d 1087 (1999)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Preston

Connecticut Supreme Court
728 A.2d 1087 (1999)

Facts

On March 19, 1994, John Preston (defendant) entered a convenience store. The cashier, Karem Shaham, was told by another customer that Preston was hiding cigarette packs under his shirt. Shaham tried to prevent Preston from leaving the store. In the struggle, Shaham ripped Preston’s shirt and multiple cigarette packs fell out. At trial, Shaham testified that some packs remained in Preston’s shirt after it was ripped. He also saw Preston was hiding three bottles of liquor. They continued to struggle. In the parking lot, Shaham attempted to take one of the bottles from Preston. Preston grabbed it back and held it over Shaham’s head in a threat to strike him. Preston then escaped in a waiting car. Preston was charged with robbery in the first degree. During trial, he requested that the jury receive an instruction on the lesser crimes of robbery in the third degree and larceny in the sixth degree. The instruction on robbery in the third degree was allowed, larceny was not. Preston was convicted of robbery in the third degree and appealed. The appellate court found that Preston was entitled to an instruction of larceny and reversed the decision. The state (plaintiff) appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Callahan, C.J.)

Dissent (Berdon, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership