State v. Santana-Lopez
Wisconsin Court of Appeals
613 N.W.2d 918 (2000)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Miguel Santana-Lopez (defendant) was charged with sexual assault of a minor. Prior to trial, Santana-Lopez had offered to take a DNA test to prove his innocence. At trial, the trial court ruled that Santana-Lopez could not testify about that offer because it was not relevant. Santana-Lopez argued that his state of mind about whether he was guilty or innocent at the time of the offer was relevant. The trial court disagreed. Santana-Lopez was convicted, and he appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fine, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.

