State v. Scottize Danyelle Brown
Iowa Supreme Court
930 N.W.2d 840 (2019)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Scottize Danyelle Brown (defendant) was convicted of a crime. Brown appealed, arguing that the Iowa Constitution could provide not less but only more protection to individuals than the U.S. Constitution.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Christensen, J.)
Concurrence (McDonald, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.