State v. Walden (and Darby)

75 N.C. App. 79, 330 S.E.2d 271 (1985)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Walden (and Darby)

North Carolina Court of Appeals
75 N.C. App. 79, 330 S.E.2d 271 (1985)

Facts

Alonzo Smith and Lawrence Reed robbed a grocery store using a toy gun. Smith and Reed were arrested along with Angela Walden (defendant), who drove them from the scene of the crime. Testimony from Smith and Reed implicated both Walden and Benita Darby (defendant) in the robbery’s planning. Walden and Darby were charged with common-law robbery and conspiracy to commit robbery with a dangerous weapon. Darby moved to dismiss the charges against her, arguing that the evidence proffered by the state (plaintiff) was insufficient to support the charges. The motion was denied. Walden and Darby were convicted of common-law robbery as principals. Darby was also convicted on the conspiracy charge. Darby appealed. The North Carolina Court of Appeals granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Martin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 834,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership