Stewart v. Amerada Hess Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
604 P.2d 854 (Okla. 1979)
The predecessor in interest to Edward Stewart (plaintiff) issued an oil and gas lease to Amerada Hess Corporation (Amerada) (defendant). The lease provided that it would remain in effect after the primary term for so long thereafter as oil and gas were produced from the leasehold in paying quantities. Stewart brought suit to terminate the lease on the ground that oil and gas were no longer being produced in paying quantities. In calculating paying quantities, Stewart did not include production-equipment depreciation in Amerada’s operating costs. The trial court agreed with this calculation methodology but held that Amerada had superior lease rights. Stewart appealed. The court of appeals reversed, holding as a matter of law that Amerada’s lease had expired due to nonproduction. Amerada appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Opala, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.