Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,400+ case briefs...

Stinnett v. Buchele

Kentucky Court of Appeals
598 S.W.2d 469 (1980)

Stinnett v. Buchele


Buchele (defendant) hired Stinnett (plaintiff) to paint the roof of Buchele’s barn. Stinnett had two years of painting experience and had painted many barn roofs. When painting these roofs, he occasionally used safety equipment, such as safety nets and belts. Stinnett did not ask Buchele to provide safety equipment, nor did he attempt to procure any. On a day when Buchele was not present, Stinnett attempted to paint the barn roof and fell from the roof, sustaining serious injuries. Stinnett brought a negligence claim against Buchele and the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Buchele, ruling that there was no evidence of negligence.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Breetz, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 497,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 497,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,400 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial