Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Stitt v. Holland Abundant Life Fellowship

614 N.W.2d 88 (2000)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...

Stitt v. Holland Abundant Life Fellowship

Michigan Supreme Court

614 N.W.2d 88 (2000)

Facts

After she tripped and broke her arm, Violet Moeller (plaintiff) brought a claim against Holland Abundant Life Fellowship (Fellowship) for negligently placing tire stops and failing to provide adequate lighting in its parking lot. The trial judge instructed the jury on the duties owed to licensees, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of Fellowship, which Moeller appealed. The court of appeals reversed and remanded for a new trial, holding that the jury should have been instructed on the duties owed to public invitees as defined in the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 332. Fellowship applied for leave to appeal, and it was granted to determine the proper standard of care owed to individuals on church property for noncommercial purposes. Jill Stitt was substituted as the named plaintiff when Moeller died.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Young, J.)

Dissent (Kelly, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 553,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 553,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 553,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 30,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership