Stone Lion Capital Partners, L.P. v. Lion Capital LP
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
746 F.3d 1317 (2014)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Stone Lion Capital Partners, L.P. (Stone Lion) (plaintiff) and Lion Capital LP (Lion Capital) (defendant) were investment management companies. Lion Capital owned registered trademarks for “LION CAPITAL” and “LION” in connection with “capital investment consultation.” Stone Lion filed an intent-to-use application for “STONE LION CAPITAL” in connection with “investment advisory services.” Lion Capital opposed the application on the ground that the mark was likely to cause confusion with Lion Capital’s marks. Both parties stated that their clientele was sophisticated. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board rejected Stone Lion’s application. Stone Lion filed suit appealing the ruling. Stone Lion argued that the scope of its investment services was not as broad the board found, and that the board erred by considering the perception of unsophisticated clientele.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wallach, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.