Stone v. Davis

66 Ohio St. 2d 74, 419 N.E.2d 1094 (1981)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Stone v. Davis

Ohio Supreme Court
66 Ohio St. 2d 74, 419 N.E.2d 1094 (1981)

AR

Facts

Davis (defendant) bought a dairy farm from Stone (plaintiff) with a mortgage loan from Ashtabula County Savings & Loan Company. Davis had never received a mortgage before. When Davis applied for the loan, Ashtabula gave disclosure documents required by the Truth in Lending Act and Federal Reserve Regulation Z. These documents informed Davis of the existence of mortgage insurance, which would continue to pay Davis’s mortgage should Davis suffer an accident or loss of income. Davis stated that he wanted mortgage insurance, but Ashtabula did nothing further to procure such insurance or inform Davis that he had to procure it himself. Davis later died in a motorcycle accident, and Stone and Ashtabula sued Davis to foreclose on the mortgage. Davis’s wife argued that Ashtabula violated the act when Ashtabula failed to help Davis procure mortgage insurance after Davis indicated he wanted it. The trial court ruled in Davis’s favor, and the appeals court affirmed. Ashtabula appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Corrigan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership