From our private database of 22,600+ case briefs...
Stone v. Powell
United States Supreme Court
428 U.S. 465 (1976)
Lloyd Powell (defendant) was convicted of murder in California state court, and his conviction was affirmed on appeal. David Rice (defendant) was convicted of murder in Nebraska state court, and his conviction was also affirmed on appeal. Both Powell and Rice claimed that their convictions were based on illegally obtained evidence and filed petitions for writs of habeas corpus in federal district court on that ground. The respective federal district courts and courts of appeal considered Powell's and Rice's claims regarding the illegally obtained evidence in ruling on the petitions. Stone and Wolff (plaintiffs), the wardens of Powell's and Rice's prisons, petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review of the decisions. The Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 519,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.