Strauss v. Horton
Supreme Court of California
207 P.3d 48 (Cal. 2009)
In California’s election in November 2008, Proposition 8, an initiative measure, was submitted to the electorate for a vote. Proposition 8 sought to amend California’s constitution to state that only heterosexual marriages are valid or recognized by the state of California. Proposition 8 was approved by a majority of the electorate during the November 2008 election. A section that stated that only heterosexual marriages were valid or recognized in the state of California was therefore added to the California’s constitution. Same-sex couples (plaintiffs) who had already married or planned to marry brought suit to challenge the deprivation of their fundamental rights to marry by means of the voter initiative measure.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (George, C.J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Moreno, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.