From our private database of 39,700+ case briefs...
Stuart v. Laird
United States Supreme Court
5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 299 (1803)
In 1802, Congress repealed the Judiciary Act of 1801, eliminating the circuit courts and circuit judges that the 1801 act had established. Soon after the repeal, Congress passed the Judiciary Act of 1802, which authorized Supreme Court justices to sit on circuit courts. The plaintiff filed a petition to overturn a judgment by a circuit court, arguing that the repeal of the 1801 act was unconstitutional. The circuit court, with Supreme Court Justice Marshall presiding, rejected the plaintiff’s petition. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Paterson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 645,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 645,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 39,700 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.