Stuckey v. Stuckey

768 P.2d 694 (1989)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Stuckey v. Stuckey

Colorado Supreme Court
768 P.2d 694 (1989)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

In 1972, married couple Carol K. Stuckey (Carol) (plaintiff) and Charles L. Stuckey (Charles) (defendant) had a son, Benjamin. The Stuckeys later divorced. In 1986, Carol sought a temporary restraining order in county court against Charles to protect herself and 14-year-old Benjamin. Carol claimed that Charles suffered from organic brain syndrome and had threatened her and Benjamin with physical violence. On December 5, the county court held a hearing and granted the temporary restraining order under the Domestic Abuse Act (DAA). The county court scheduled a final hearing for December 19. Following testimonial evidence at the final hearing, the county court concluded that the restraining order should be made permanent. An order was issued that prevented Charles from having any contact with Carol and Benjamin. Charles appealed on the ground that the county court exceeded its jurisdiction because district courts have exclusive jurisdiction to decide matters concerning children. On appeal, the district court held that the county court did not exceed its jurisdiction. The matter was appealed again. The Colorado Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lohr, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 814,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership