Summit House Co. v. Gershman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
502 N.W.2d 422 (1993)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Bruce and Karen Gershman (defendants) signed a contract to sell their condominium to Summit House Company (Summit) (plaintiff). Summit sued to terminate the contract. The district court awarded the Gershmans specific performance, requiring Summit to pay approximately $107,000. Summit did not pay the judgment. The Gershmans levied execution on the contract and bought Summit’s interest at a sheriff’s sale for approximately $73,000. Summit did not bid at the sheriff’s sale. Summit filed a motion for a judgment that the sale to the Gershmans satisfied the prior judgment against Summit. The district court denied the motion, finding Summit owed the Gershmans approximately $34,000, the difference between the sale price and the judgment. Summit appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Anderson, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.