Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
  • S
  • Sun Operating Limited Partnership v. HoltSun Operating Limited Partnership v. Holt
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

Sun Operating Limited Partnership v. Holt

Texas Court of Appeals
984 S.W.2d 277 (Tex. App. 1998)


Elizabeth and Robert Holt (plaintiffs) were the lessors of two oil and gas leases, under which Sun Operating Limited Partnership (Sun) (defendant) was the lessee. The leases’ habendum clauses stated that once the primary terms were extended, cessation of production for more than 60 consecutive days could terminate the leases. However, the leases also contained force majeure clauses stating that if operations were “interrupted by fire, storm, flood, war . . . or failure of carriers to transport or furnish facilities for transportation . . . or as a result of any cause whatsoever beyond the control of the Lessee,” the interruption would not be held against Sun. Producing wells were drilled on the leaseholds, extending the primary terms of the leases. Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Company (Panhandle) was the sole purchaser of gas from the wells and transported the gas directly from the wells. Several years after the primary terms were extended, Panhandle needed to conduct major renovations on its transmission line. The renovations delayed production for more than 60 days. The Holts brought suit to cancel the leases under the terms of the habendum clauses. Sun argued that the force majeure clauses prevented termination of the leases. The trial court declared that the leases were terminated. Sun appealed, arguing in part that Sun should have been granted a directed verdict because the sole cause of the cessation of production was Panhandle’s failure to transport the gas.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Quinn, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 450,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 450,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial