From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Superadio Limited Partnership v. Winstar Radio Productions, LLC
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
844 N.E.2d 246 (2006)
Superadio Limited Partnership (plaintiff) and Walt “Baby” Love Productions, Inc., to which Winstar Radio Productions, LLC (Baby Love) (defendant) was successor in interest, entered into an agreement for the equal division of net revenues collected from the sale of advertising on radio programs. Under the agreement, any dispute was to be arbitrated before a panel of the American Arbitration Association sitting in Boston, Massachusetts. Superadio filed an arbitration demand, alleging that Baby Love had withheld advertising revenues that should have been shared with Superadio. Baby Love counterclaimed, alleging that Superadio had violated the agreement by withholding advertising revenues Superadio had collected on Baby Love’s behalf. During the arbitration proceeding, Superadio maintained that Baby Love’s attorney, who was licensed to practice in New York but not in Massachusetts, was engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. The arbitration panel granted partial summary judgment to Baby Love but could not enter a damages award because Superadio had failed to produce documents relevant to damages. The panel rejected the argument that Baby Love’s attorney was engaged in the unauthorized practice of law and sanctioned Superadio for the discovery violation. Superadio filed a complaint seeking to vacate the arbitration award. The trial court affirmed the award. On appeal, Superadio argued, in part, that the award was obtained by undue means because Baby Love's out-of-state attorney had been engaged in the unauthorized practice of law during the arbitration proceeding. The appellate court reversed the award. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court granted Baby Love’s application for review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Greaney, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 604,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.