Superfos Investments Limited v. FirstMiss Fertilizer, Inc.
United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
821 F.Supp. 432 (1993)
- Written by Tom Syverson, JD
Facts
FirstMiss Fertilizer, Inc. (FirstMiss) (defendant) had a three-year contract with Superfos Investments Limited (Superfos) (plaintiff). FirstMiss agreed to purchase a minimum of 80,000 tons of anhydrous ammonia per year from Sueprfos. Superfos purchased the ammonia from Farmland Industries, Inc. (Farmland) and resold the ammonia to FirstMiss. The contract said that if FirstMiss did not order the yearly contract amount, then FirstMiss would still be responsible for paying for that minimum amount. The contract also said that if Farmland did not deliver enough ammonia to Superfos, then Superfos would be relieved of its obligation to provide ammonia to FirstMiss. FirstMiss ordered less than 80,000 tons of ammonia per year. Superfos sued to recover the purchase price of the shortfall. FirstMiss moved for partial summary judgment, arguing that the provision requiring FirstMiss to pay the full purchase price for undelivered ammonia was unenforceable.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lee, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.