Surfrider Foundation v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Hawai'i Supreme Court
358 P.3d 664 (2015)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The Honolulu City Council established a building height setback requirement on the shoreline as part of a special design district designed to maintain the Waikiki neighborhood’s identity. The ordinance allowed for a variance if (1) the applicant would be deprived of the reasonable use of its land absent the variance; (2) the variance was needed due to circumstances unique to the applicant, as opposed to general neighborhood circumstances; and (3) the variance would not change the essential character of the neighborhood and was not contrary to the purpose of the ordinance. Kyo-ya Hotels & Resorts LP filed a variance application, seeking to redevelop an eight-story hotel into a 26-story hotel that would encroach on the height setback requirement by 74 percent. The city approved the variance. Surfrider Foundation and others (plaintiffs) appealed the decision. The Zoning Board of Appeals (defendant) affirmed. The circuit court affirmed the Board’s decision. Surfrider appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pollack, J.)
Concurrence (Recktenwald, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 789,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.