Sutton v. Moody
Court of King’s Bench
91 Eng. Rep. 1063, 1 Ld. Raym. 250 (1698)
- Written by Erin Enser, JD
Facts
A hunter (defendant) broke into a landowner’s (plaintiff) close of land and killed 100 conies (i.e., rabbits). The landowner sued for damages, claiming the conies taken by the hunter belonged to the landowner. Judgment was entered for the landowner, and a motion for arrest of judgment was filed, arguing that conies were ferae naturae (i.e., wild animals), which the landowner, not in possession of a warren, could not claim by possession or privilege.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Holt, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.