SVAP II Pasadena Crossroads, LLC v. Fitness International LLC

260 Md. App. 77, 306 A.3d 748 (2023)

From our private database of 47,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

SVAP II Pasadena Crossroads, LLC v. Fitness International LLC

Maryland Appellate Court
260 Md. App. 77, 306 A.3d 748 (2023)

Facts

SVAP II Pasadena Crossroads, LLC (SVAP) (plaintiff) leased space in a Maryland shopping center to Fitness International, LLC (defendant), known as L.A. Fitness (LAF), for the operation of a fitness facility. The lease required LAF to pay monthly minimum rent plus additional rent to cover taxes, common-area expenses, and trash removal. The lease contained a force-majeure provision stating that performance of contractual obligations was excused during a force-majeure event, defined as a time in which a party’s performance was delayed or hindered because of restrictive laws or other reasons beyond the party’s control. However, the provision expressly excepted LAF’s rent obligation, stating that rent payment was not excused by any force-majeure event. In March 2020, Maryland’s governor issued an order requiring the closure of all fitness centers to the public because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Before April rent was due, LAF informed SVAP that it would not be paying because the forced closure of LAF’s fitness center frustrated the lease’s purpose and constituted a force-majeure event rendering payment under the lease impracticable. LAF did not pay rent in April, May, or June but resumed payments in July after the governor allowed fitness centers to reopen. SVAP sued LAF for breach of contract, seeking $206,644.45 in back rent. LAF filed a counterclaim, arguing that SVAP had breached multiple contractual provisions, including one stating that SVAP would own the property during the lease term free of covenants or restrictions that might impact LAF’s property use. The trial court held in LAF’s favor. SVAP appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Berger, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 912,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 912,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,200 briefs, keyed to 998 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 912,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,200 briefs - keyed to 998 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership