T & E Industries v. Safety Light Corp.
New Jersey Supreme Court
123 N.J. 371 (1991)
- Written by Lauren Petersen, JD
Facts
T & E Industries (plaintiff) purchased a property in New Jersey that had been owned many years earlier by the United States Radium Corporation (USRC). USRC processed radium and disposed of radium byproducts onsite. The radium byproducts eventually decayed into radon, which can cause bone cancer, lung cancer, and leukemia. The U.S. government did not begin to regulate the disposal of radium byproducts until 1978. In 1979, a state inspector tested the property then owned by T & E. The tests showed that the property was contaminated with radon. T & E moved its operations elsewhere, but could not sell the property until it had cleaned up the property. In 1981, T & E sued the successors of USRC, including Safety Light Corporation (defendant). T & E alleged, among other things, that Safety Light was strictly liable for any injuries resulting from conducting the abnormally dangerous activity of extracting radium. Safety Light moved to dismiss the suit. The trial court granted Safety Light’s motion, holding that a defendant can only be held strictly liable for engaging in an abnormally dangerous activity if the defendant knew at the time of its actions that its activity was in fact abnormally dangerous. T & E appealed, and the court of appeals reversed. The court reasoned that successors in title could sue a prior owner for strict liability so long they did not knowingly accept the burdens associated with the property. Safety Light petitioned for certification, and the supreme court granted the petition.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Clifford, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.