United States Supreme Court
483 U.S. 107 (1987)
Conover and Tanner (defendants) were convicted of mail fraud and conspiracy. After the conviction, one of the jurors called Tanner’s attorney and informed him that several of the jurors drank alcohol during lunch breaks and often slept through the afternoons of the trial. Tanner filed a motion for a new trial and an evidentiary hearing at which he could interview the jurors. The district court heard arguments on the issue and then denied the motion. Subsequently, a second juror similarly told Tanner’s attorney that a number of the jurors drank, a few smoked marijuana, and two did cocaine during the trial. Tanner filed another motion for a new trial and the district court again denied the motion. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 241,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.