Tanzymore v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

457 F.2d 1320 (1972)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Tanzymore v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
457 F.2d 1320 (1972)

Tanzymore v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

Facts

Tanzymore (plaintiff) filed a personal injury suit against Bethlehem Steel Corporation (Bethlehem) (defendant) in district court. Tanzymore claimed to be a domiciliary of Ohio for the purposes of diversity jurisdiction; however, neither his deposition testimony nor his filings with the court provided any evidence that Tanzymore had a permanent residence in Ohio. In fact, the bulk of the evidence suggested that Tanzymore was domiciled in Pennsylvania. The district court dismissed his complaint for lack of diversity jurisdiction, and Tanzymore appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gibbons, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 821,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership